Scottish MSP Discovers AI's Power and Limitations in RMM

Mear Technology

Mear Technology

Other

Stephen Mears

Stephen Mears

Founder

1-50

Employees

1,000

Managed Seats

Scottish MSP Discovers AI's Power and Limitations in RMM

Summary

Stephen Mears is the founder of Mears Technology, a Scotland-based MSP established in 2011 that manages 1,000 endpoints and 1,500 users across small and medium businesses in central Scotland and beyond. With a team of five technicians and nearly a decade and a half of hands-on RMM experience, Stephen is not an easy person to impress. He evaluates the major platforms regularly like Datto, ConnectWise, Ninja, and others, and in all that time has never once found a reason to switch. That changed when he started testing OpenFrame. The AI resolved complex technical problems in seconds that would have taken his team a week to work through manually. For the first time in 14 years, Stephen is actively considering a full platform migration, and his feedback is shaping exactly what that path looks like.

Challenge

Mears Technology had long since outgrown what off-the-shelf RMM platforms were built to offer. Stephen and his team had spent years developing custom automation workflows, a homegrown PSA, and hundreds of scripts to compensate for the gaps that every major vendor left open. The core problem wasn't any one platform — it was a market-wide blind spot. Every major RMM focuses heavily on technical feature parity while ignoring the proactive maintenance and sales intelligence that would actually make MSPs more profitable. MSPs sit on enormous amounts of endpoint data — operating system versions, hardware age, software installed, device specifications — but have no native tools to turn that data into upsell opportunities, automated client reporting, or lifecycle planning. Stephen had built his own solution to this using N8N workflows that scraped APIs, generated HTML reports for decision-makers, and flagged machines approaching end of life — all because no vendor had bothered to build it natively. The status quo wasn't just frustrating. It was leaving money on the table for every MSP in the market.

Solution

OpenFrame's AI capabilities cut through immediately. Tasks that would sit in Datto's job queue for five to ten minutes — sometimes longer, ran instantly. Complex diagnostics that would have required a technician to spend hours digging through logs, running scripts manually, and troubleshooting results were resolved in a single prompt. Stephen described the experience as awe-inspiring, specifically calling out fixes that his team would have spent a week working through. What stood out most was the ability to action fleet-wide operations without connecting to individual machines, simply describing the problem and letting the AI go find and fix it across the entire estate. Beyond raw speed, Stephen recognised something more significant in OpenFrame's approach: the potential to use AI not just as a reactive tool, but as a way to build permanent automated fixes that run on their own. The vision he outlined — AI diagnoses the problem once, creates the script, and schedules it to run indefinitely without human intervention — is precisely the direction OpenFrame is building toward.

Results

Stephen Mears sits in a rare category: a technically sophisticated, 14-year Datto veteran who is genuinely ready to switch. His evaluation of OpenFrame has been one of the most detailed and substantive in the beta program, and his feedback has directly informed the platform's near-term development priorities. UDFs at device, site, and global level, advanced filtering and data visualisation, brandable Fae, and smarter AI-to-automation handoffs are all areas where his input has added clarity and urgency to the roadmap. Beyond the product specifics, Stephen brought a broader industry perspective that is increasingly relevant to how OpenFrame positions itself. As AI reduces headcounts across every sector — fewer users, fewer devices, fewer endpoints to bill against — the MSPs that survive and grow will be the ones who build their value around outcomes rather than volume. Per-device and per-user pricing, he argued, is a model with a shelf life. OpenFrame, built around AI efficiency and automation from the ground up, is already aligned with where the industry is heading. Stephen sees that clearly — and is watching the platform close the remaining gaps with a migration plan in mind.

Related Content

Case Studies

Product Releases

Webinars

Blog Posts

Onboarding Guides

Frequently Asked Questions

MSPs use AI to triage and route tickets, cut alert noise, schedule patches, assist L1 security work, and draft client reports. Kaseya's 2025 benchmark found 30% already use it to eliminate tedious tasks, with ticket triage the most common starting point.
Most MSPs start with AI features inside their existing PSA, RMM, and ticketing systems rather than standalone products. Common categories include AI ticket triage, alert correlation, scripting assistants, and AI-native all-in-one platforms like OpenFrame that run intelligence across the whole stack.
Start with a readiness assessment, not a tool purchase. Confirm your ticket history is clean and your RMM, PSA, and monitoring systems connect. Then pick one high-volume, low-risk workflow, usually ticket triage, and pilot it on internal tickets before any client sees it.
Automate high-volume, low-risk tasks first. Ticket triage and alert noise reduction top the list because they run constantly and a human still resolves the underlying issue. Save security approvals, billing changes, and client-facing actions for later, always with a human in the loop.
It can be, with governance. Keep a human in the loop on high-risk actions, log every automated step for audit, and choose platforms that keep your data yours with no vendor lock-in. Pilot on internal data first so you catch issues before client systems are involved.
Set a baseline before rollout, then track tickets closed per technician, mean time to resolution, percentage of tickets resolved with no human touch, technician hours reclaimed, and cost per ticket. AI-driven automation commonly cuts operational cost per ticket by 25 to 40%.
No. AI automates routine tickets, patching, and monitoring, but trust, accountability, and complex business judgment still need people. The future of managed services moves technicians from closing tickets to advising clients, which makes the human role more valuable, not obsolete.
AI-powered infrastructure managed services apply machine learning to infrastructure telemetry so providers can predict failures, automatically remediate known issues, and forecast capacity needs. They replace static-threshold monitoring and manual firefighting with predictive, largely automated operations overseen by technicians.
Yes, for low-risk categories. MSPs report 10% to 25% of tickets closed without a tech opening them, covering password resets, MFA enrollment, and known installs. Anything needing judgment or touching production data still escalates to a human.
AI decouples revenue from headcount. When automation handles routine work, labor costs grow slower than revenue, so margins expand as you scale. The 2026 Kaseya report found 53% of MSPs already automate ticketing, patching, and monitoring to protect margin.

Try it. Break it.

Deploy it. Love it.

And finally, stop paying $14K/month for tools that fight each other.